Janani Ramachandran Oakland City Councilmember, District 4 Talks Veto Of Mayor Thao Salary Increse Councilmember’s I entered this budget cycle with a commitment to passing a budget that rebuilds public trust in City Hall, funds basic city services, and supports safe neighborhoods where every resident can thrive. I respect my fellow Council colleagues, and the significant efforts they have all put into trying to serve our city’s needs in a difficult budget cycle where we face a $360 million projected deficit. I am also grateful for the tireless efforts of our city’s Finance staff who skillfully maneuvered this challenging process. In particular, I want to express my appreciation for the Council President’s Budget Team’s inclusion of several of my proposed amendments which I presented earlier this month, based on the feedback of my constituents and community stakeholders. The budget which passed ultimately included funding for: Community Safety Ambassadors in commercial corridors to help curb the uptick of crime, Traffic Safety interventions, Grant Writer focused on increasing public safety resources, Department of Violence Prevention contracts with local nonprofits, Cultural Affairs community grants, Expanded affordable housing initiatives, Additional Tree Services workers, which support wildfire prevention efforts, Major improvements across city parks, including those in District 4. I entered office earlier this year with a strong and unwavering commitment to uphold the values of government transparency, responsiveness to community concerns, and accountability as fiduciaries of Oakland’s limited dollars. I do not take this commitment lightly, and factor them into every decision that I make as a public servant. It is precisely this commitment that led me to abstain from voting for the proposed budget this week. My decision to abstain was wholly based on the proposed re-organizations and mergers of Oakland’s Department of Parks, Recreation, and Youth Development (OPRYD) with the Human Services Department, and the merger of the Department of Housing and Community Development with Homelessness Services. To me, the decision to merge departments was not transparent, fiscally prudent, nor responsive to the plethora of community concerns. As stated in my presentation at Monday’s council meeting (see video clip here), after receiving a developmental study on the matter, I am not at all opposed to contemplating the re-organizations of city departments. However, in this budget cycle, we were asked to approve such mergers before receiving any written information whatsoever about the proposed mergers regarding potential financial benefits and improved services for Oakland residents. There were several reasons why I did not want to vote on a department merger before seeing a study that explores its feasibility: Firstly, these mergers have been contemplated and studied in recent history, yet not executed for specific reasons. I wanted to understand what circumstances have changed since that now may make it feasible. Secondly, especially in the wake of a staff vacancy crisis, it was unclear how staff in departments with incredibly different functions would be re-organized or re-hired. For example, Housing and Community Development (HCD) performs tasks that focus on construction of new affordable housing, as well as administration of grants and similar functions. In contrast, Homelessness Services focuses on providing direct social services to our unhoused community. Thirdly, given the tragic escalation of Oakland’s homelessness crisis, I would want to explore the possibility of a standalone Homelessness Department as other similarly sized cities have done. This is especially important given our urgent need to streamline spending of our limited homelessness dollars (as last year’s City Auditor’s report revealed gross inefficiencies in the way they are currently spent), and the need to establish a clearer channel of communication and partnership with the Alameda County Board of Supervisors. Finally, the presentations from the Mayor’s office and City Administration did not delineate clear nor substantial cost savings – and the more questions we asked about it, the more uncertain the financial implications appeared. As fiduciaries of Oakland’s financial resources that voters have trusted us to protect, especially in a budget deficit that requires fiscal prudence, I was uncomfortable to take actions that had not been properly analyzed nor vetted.
via IFTTT
Note from Oakland News Now Blog, Zennie62 YouTube, and Zennie62Media: this Oakland News Online Blog video-blog post demonstrates the full and live operation of the latest updated version of an experimental Zennie62Media , Inc. mobile media video-blogging system network that was launched June 2018, originally on Zennie62Media , Inc.’s Oakland News Now. This is a major part of Zennie62Media , Inc.’s new and innovative approach to the production of news media. This is what we call “The Third Wave of Media”. The uploaded video is from a “liked” YouTube video by a vlogger with the Zennie62 on YouTube Partner Channel, then that YouTube video is uploaded to and formatted automatically at the Oakland News Online Blog site and Zennie62Media -created and owned social media pages. The overall objective is smartphone-enabled, real-time, on the scene reporting of news, interviews, observations, and happenings anywhere in the World and within seconds and not hours. Now, news is reported with a smartphone: no heavy and expensive cameras or even a laptop are necessary, thus less chance for Oakland News Online Blog, Zennie62 YouTube vloggers to be robbed. The secondary objective is faster, and very inexpensive media content news production and distribution. We have found there is a disconnect between post length and time to product and revenue generated. With this, the problem is far less, though by no means solved. Zennie62Media is constantly working to improve the system network coding and seeks interested content and media technology partners. This process is entirely within YouTube terms of service, where embedding of videos for use on websites and platforms is allowed and encouraged.